Cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia in patients with migraine: A dual-echo arterial spin labeling MRI study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare cerebrovascular reactivity between patients with migraine and controls using state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. BACKGROUND: Migraine is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, but the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Impaired cerebrovascular reactivity has been proposed as a link. Previous studies have evaluated cerebrovascular reactivity with different methodologies and results are conflicting. METHODS: In this single-center, observational, case-control study, we included 31 interictal patients with migraine without aura (aged 19-66 years, 17 females) and 31 controls (aged 22-64 years, 18 females) with no history of vascular disease. Global and regional cerebrovascular reactivities were assessed with a dual-echo arterial spin labeling (ASL) 3.0 T MRI scan of the brain which measured the change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) signal to inhalation of 5% carbon dioxide. RESULTS: When comparing patients with migraine to controls, cerebrovascular reactivity values were similar between the groups, including mean gray matter CBF-based cerebrovascular reactivity (3.2 ± 0.9 vs 3.4 ± 1% ΔCBF/mmHg CO2 ; p = 0.527), mean gray matter BOLD-based cerebrovascular reactivity (0.18 ± 0.04 vs 0.18 ± 0.04% ΔBOLD/mmHg CO2 ; p = 0.587), and mean white matter BOLD-based cerebrovascular reactivity (0.08 ± 0.03 vs 0.08 ± 0.02% ΔBOLD/mmHg CO2 ; p = 0.621).There was no association of cerebrovascular reactivity with monthly migraine days or migraine disease duration (all analyses p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide seems to be preserved in patients with migraine without aura.

[Pain in cancer]. / Pijn bij kanker.

Patients with cancer often experience pain that significantly interferes with their daily life. In this review paper the authors discuss the different aspects of cancer pain by answering different questions regarding cancer pain. Items that are discussed include measurement of pain, medical and interventional pain treatment, side effects, opioid tolerance and addiction and barriers that preclude proper treatment of pain. The conclusion of this review paper is that the treatment of cancer pain is complex and warrants a multidisciplinary team effort with a central role for the patient.

Sublingual Sufentanil versus Standard-of-Care (Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil or Intravenous Morphine) for Postoperative Pain Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Trial.

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for postoperative pain following pancreatoduodenectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) is a non-inferior analgesic compared to our standard-of-care (patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] or PCA morphine) in the treatment of pain following pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: This was a pragmatic, strategy, open-label, non-inferiority, parallel group, randomized (1:1) trial. The primary outcome was an overall mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale: 0-10) on postoperative days 1 to 3 combined. The non-inferiority margin was -1.5 since this difference was considered clinically relevant. Results: Between October 2018 and July 2021, 190 patients were assessed for eligibility and 36 patients were included in the final analysis: 17 patients were randomized to SST and 19 patients to standard-of-care. Early treatment failure in the SST group occurred in 2 patients (12%) due to inability to operate the SST system and in 2 patients (12%) due to severe nausea despite antiemetics. Early treatment failure in the standard-of-care group occurred in 2 patients (11%) due to preoperative PCEA placement failure and in 1 patient (5%) due to hemodynamic instability caused by PCEA. The mean difference in pain score on postoperative day 1 to 3 was -0.10 (95% CI -0.72-0.52), and therefore the non-inferiority of SST compared to standard-of-care was demonstrated. The mean pain score, number of patients reporting unacceptable pain (pain score >4), Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score, and patient satisfaction per postoperative day, perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: This first randomized study investigating the use of SST in 36 patients following pancreatoduodenectomy showed that SST is non-inferior compared to our standard-of-care in the treatment of pain on postoperative days 1 to 3. Future research is needed to confirm that these findings are applicable to other settings.

Comparison of neuromuscular block measured by compressomyography at the upper arm and electromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle in obese and non-obese patients: An observational study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is traditionally evaluated at the adductor pollicis muscle. By contrast, the TOF-Cuff compressomyograph evaluates neuromuscular block (NMB) at the upper arm. However, compressomyography has not been fully validated against other monitoring entities. This study evaluates the agreement between NMB measured by compressomyography at the upper arm and electromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle during various levels of neuromuscular block in patients with and without obesity. INTERVENTIONS: NMB was measured at the upper arm by compressomyography (TOF-Cuff) and by electromyography (GE-NMT) at the adductor pollicis. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care hospitals' operating theatres. PATIENTS: 200 non-obese and 50 obese patients. MEASUREMENTS: During onset and offset of deep (post-tetanic-count 1-15 twitches), moderate (Train-of-Four-count 1-3 twitches) and shallow (Train-of-Four-ratio 0.01-1.0) depths of NMB were measured in obese and non-obese patients. The bias and limits of agreement of both devices were calculated using a Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements. Data obtained during spontaneous recovery (i.e. without the use of reversal agents) were used in the primary analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Data from enrolled patients yielded 942 paired post-tetanic-counts, 1175 paired train-of-four-counts and 1574 paired train-of-four ratios during spontaneous recovery. In non-obese patients, mean bias (95% CI) between the two devices was 3.405 (2.294 to 4.517) during deep NMB; -0.023 (-0.205 to 0.160) during moderate NMB and 0.312 (0.287 to 0.338) during shallow NMB. In obese patients, bias was -0.170 (-2.872 to 2.531); 0.178 (-0.202 to 0.558); 0.384 (0.299 to 0.469) for deep, moderate and shallow NMB respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is variable disagreement between the level of NMB measured at the upper arm by compressomyography and at the adductor pollicis muscle measured by electromyography, throughout the various stages of NMB in obese and non-obese patients. Recovery of NMB on compressomyography preceded recovery on electromyography, which may have consequences for reversal and extubation decisions in clinical practice.

Brachial plexus tumors extending into the cervicothoracic spine: a review with operative nuances and outcomes

Background The rarity and anatomical complexity of brachial plexus tumors (BPTs) impose many challenges onto surgeons performing surgical resections, especially when these tumors invade the cervicothoracic spine. Treatment choices and surgery outcomes heavily depend on anatomical location and tumor type. Methods The authors performed an extensive review of the published literature (PubMed) focusing on “brachial plexus tumors” that identified invasion of the cervicothoracic spine. Result The search yielded 2774 articles pertaining to “brachial plexus tumors”. Articles not in the English language or involving cervicothoracic spinal invasion were excluded. Conclusions Recent research has shown that the most common method used to resect tumors of the proximal roots is the dorsal subscapular approach. Despite its association with high morbidity rate, this technique offers excellent exposure to the spinal roots and intraforaminal portion of the spinal nerve. The dorsal approach is used to resect recurrent lower trunk tumors and dumbbell-shaped neurofibromas, yet it is also the least common overall approach used in brachial plexus tumor resections. The ventral or anterior technique is commonly used to resect tumors at the cord to division level, and root to trunk level. Motor complications, transient nerve palsy, and bleeding are among the most common complications of the anterior supraclavicular approach. Further controlled studies are needed to fully determine the optimal surgical approach used to obtain the best outcomes and least complications for each type of brachial plexus tumor (AU)

Brachial plexus tumors extending into the cervicothoracic spine: a review with operative nuances and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The rarity and anatomical complexity of brachial plexus tumors (BPTs) impose many challenges onto surgeons performing surgical resections, especially when these tumors invade the cervicothoracic spine. Treatment choices and surgery outcomes heavily depend on anatomical location and tumor type. METHODS: The authors performed an extensive review of the published literature (PubMed) focusing on "brachial plexus tumors" that identified invasion of the cervicothoracic spine. RESULTS: The search yielded 2774 articles pertaining to "brachial plexus tumors". Articles not in the English language or involving cervicothoracic spinal invasion were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Recent research has shown that the most common method used to resect tumors of the proximal roots is the dorsal subscapular approach. Despite its association with high morbidity rate, this technique offers excellent exposure to the spinal roots and intraforaminal portion of the spinal nerve. The dorsal approach is used to resect recurrent lower trunk tumors and dumbbell-shaped neurofibromas, yet it is also the least common overall approach used in brachial plexus tumor resections. The ventral or anterior technique is commonly used to resect tumors at the cord to division level, and root to trunk level. Motor complications, transient nerve palsy, and bleeding are among the most common complications of the anterior supraclavicular approach. Further controlled studies are needed to fully determine the optimal surgical approach used to obtain the best outcomes and least complications for each type of brachial plexus tumor.

[Postoperative opioid overdose due to patient-controlled analgesia by proxy]. / Postoperatieve overdosering morfine door familielid.

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a popular and efficacious form of postoperative pain relief that, however, is not without complications. Here we describe a 73-year-old Somalian male patient that underwent abdominal surgery and received intravenous morphine PCA for postoperative pain relief. Due to his inability to speak the native language, his son served as interpreter. On the day after surgery, the patient was found unresponsive by the nursing staff with an oxygen saturation of 91%. He was treated with naloxone and transferred to a medium care facility. The son indicated that he had operated the PCA system at regular intervals over the last 12 hours. The dangers of PCA and PCA by proxy in particular are discussed. In this case, the language barrier, and possibly cultural differences and health illiteracy may have contributed to the PCA by proxy.

Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background: The optimal analgesic technique after pancreatoduodenectomy remains under debate. This study aimed to see whether epidural analgesia (EA) has superior clinical outcomes compared with non-epidural alternatives (N-EA) in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. On 28 August 2018, relevant literature databases were searched. Primary outcomes were pain scores. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure of initial analgesia, complications, duration of hospital stay and mortality. Results: Three RCTs and eight cohort studies (25 089 patients) were included. N-EA treatments studied were: intravenous morphine, continuous wound infiltration, bilateral paravertebral thoracic catheters and intrathecal morphine. Patients receiving EA had a marginally lower pain score on days 0-3 after surgery than those receiving intravenous morphine (mean difference (MD) -0·50, 95 per cent c.i. -0·80 to -0·21; P < 0·001) and similar pain scores to patients who had continuous wound infiltration. Treatment failure occurred in 28·5 per cent of patients receiving EA, mainly for haemodynamic instability or inadequate pain control. EA was associated with fewer complications (odds ratio (OR) 0·69, 95 per cent c.i. 0·06 to 0·79; P < 0·001), shorter duration of hospital stay (MD -2·69 (95 per cent c.i. -2·76 to -2·62) days; P < 0·001) and lower mortality (OR 0·69, 0·51 to 0 93; P = 0·02) compared with intravenous morphine. Conclusion: EA provides marginally lower pain scores in the first postoperative days than intravenous morphine, and appears to be associated with fewer complications, shorter duration of hospital stay and less mortality.

Antecedentes: La técnica analgésica óptima tras una duodenopancreatectomía permanece en debate. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar si la analgesia epidural (epidural analgesia, EA) presenta resultados clínicos superiores en comparación con las alternativas no epidurales (non­epidural alternatives, N­EA) en pacientes que se someten a una duodenopancreatectomía. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis de acuerdo con las recomendaciones PRISMA. El 28 de agosto de 2018, se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos relevantes de la literatura. El objetivo primario fueron las puntuaciones de dolor. Los objetivos secundarios fueron el fracaso del tratamiento de la analgesia inicial, las complicaciones, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y la mortalidad. Resultados: Se incluyeron tres ensayos aleatorizados y controlados y ocho estudios de cohortes (25.089 pacientes). Las N­EA estudiadas fueron: morfina intravenosa (iv), infiltración continua de la herida, catéteres torácicos paravertebrales bilaterales y morfina intratecal. Los pacientes con EA tuvieron una puntuación de dolor marginalmente más baja en los días postoperatorios 0 a 3 en comparación con la morfina iv (diferencia de medias (MD) = ­ 0,50, i.c. del 95% ­0,80 a ­0,21; P < 0,001) y puntuaciones de dolor similares en comparación con la infiltración continua de la herida. El fallo del tratamiento ocurrió en el 28,5% de los pacientes con EA, principalmente por inestabilidad hemodinámica o control inadecuado del dolor. La EA se asoció con menos complicaciones (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR = 0,69, i.c. del 95% 0,061 a 0,79; P < 0,001), menor duración de la estancia hospitalaria (MD = ­2,69 días, i.c. del 95% ­2,76 a ­2,62; P < 0,001) y menor mortalidad en comparación con la morfina iv (OR = 0,69, i.c. del 95% 0,51 a 0,93; P = 0,01). Conclusión: La EA proporciona puntuaciones de dolor ligeramente más bajas en los primeros días postoperatorios en comparación con la morfina iv y parece asociarse con menos complicaciones, menor duración de la estancia hospitalaria y menor mortalidad.

PACS Integration of Semiautomated Imaging Software Improves Day-to-Day MS Disease Activity Detection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The standard for evaluating interval radiologic activity in MS, side-by-side MR imaging comparison, is restricted by its time-consuming nature and limited sensitivity. VisTarsier, a semiautomated software for comparing volumetric FLAIR sequences, has shown better disease-activity detection than conventional comparison in retrospective studies. Our objective was to determine whether implementing this software in day-to-day practice would show similar efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VisTarsier created an additional coregistered image series for reporting a color-coded disease-activity change map for every new MS MR imaging brain study that contained volumetric FLAIR sequences. All other MS studies, including those generated during software-maintenance periods, were interpreted with side-by-side comparison only. The number of new lesions reported with software assistance was compared with those observed with traditional assessment in a generalized linear mixed model. Questionnaires were sent to participating radiologists to evaluate the perceived day-to-day impact of the software. RESULTS: Nine hundred six study pairs from 538 patients during 2 years were included. The semiautomated software was used in 841 study pairs, while the remaining 65 used conventional comparison only. Twenty percent of software-aided studies reported having new lesions versus 9% with standard comparison only. The use of this software was associated with an odds ratio of 4.15 for detection of new or enlarging lesions (P = .040), and 86.9% of respondents from the survey found that the software saved at least 2-5 minutes per scan report. CONCLUSIONS: VisTarsier can be implemented in real-world clinical settings with good acceptance and preservation of accuracy demonstrated in a retrospective environment.

Safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block.

Introduction: Sugammadex is a modified cyclodextrin that is able to reverse neuromuscular block induced by aminosteroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs. Compared to reversal with neostigmine, it reverses neuromuscular block quicker and more predictable and without cholinergic side effects. However, there have been concerns about sugammadex ability to bind other drugs and its effects on QT interval and clotting times. In addition, sugammadex might induce hypersensitivity reactions more frequently than initially anticipated. This review summarizes current evidence with regard to these and other safety aspects of sugammadex. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the efficacy of sugammadex in various patient populations, evaluates potential interactions with other drugs and discusses adverse effects and reactions that have been reported in the literature. Expert opinion: Sugammadex quickly reverses aminosteroid neuromuscular block with less side effects compared to neostigmine. As such, it has the potential to significantly reduce the incidence of residual neuromuscular block and to improve postoperative pulmonary outcome. Current safety concerns mainly focus on hypersensitivity reactions and cardiac arrhythmias. Although the absolute risk for these events is low, ongoing vigilance and research in this area are needed.

Legal and ethical implications of defining an optimum means of achieving unconsciousness in assisted dying.

A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10%), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4%), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an 'optimum' itself has important implications for ethics and the law.

Differential role of nitric oxide in the psychedelic symptoms induced by racemic ketamine and esketamine in human volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Animal studies suggest that N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction and subsequent decline in intracellular nitric oxide (NO) are responsible for development of ketamine-induced psychedelic symptoms. To examine this mechanism in humans, we administered the NO donor sodium nitroprusside during infusion of racemic ketamine (RS-ketamine), containing equal amounts of S(+)- and R(-)-ketamine isomers, or esketamine, containing just the S(+)-isomer. METHODS: In this randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, healthy volunteers were treated with sodium nitroprusside 0.5 µg kg-1 min-1 or placebo during administration of escalating doses of RS-ketamine (total dose 140 mg) or esketamine (70 mg). Drug high, internal and external perception, obtained using the Bowdle questionnaire, were scored over time on a visual analogue scale. The area-under-the-time-effect-curve (AUC) was calculated for each end-point. RESULTS: Sodium nitroprusside significantly reduced drug high AUC [mean (standard deviation); placebo 9070 (4630) vs sodium nitroprusside 7100 (3320), P=0.02], internal perception AUC [placebo 1310 (1250) vs nitroprusside 748 (786), P<0.01] and external perception AUC [placebo 4110 (2840) vs nitroprusside 2890 (2120), P=0.02] during RS-ketamine infusion, but was without effect on any of these measures during esketamine infusion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that NO depletion plays a role in RS-ketamine-induced psychedelic symptoms in humans. The sodium nitroprusside effect was observed for R(-)- but not S(+)-isomer-induced psychedelic symptoms. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings and assess whether higher sodium nitroprusside doses will reduce esketamine-induced psychedelic symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR 5359.

Esketamine counters opioid-induced respiratory depression.

BACKGROUND: Opioids can produce life-threatening respiratory depression. This study tested whether subanaesthetic doses of esketamine stimulate breathing in an established human model of opioid-induced respiratory depression. METHODS: In a study with a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover design, 12 healthy, young volunteers of either sex received a dose escalating infusion of esketamine (cumulative dose 40 mg infused in 1 h) on top of remifentanil-induced respiratory depression. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed with sites of drug action at baseline ventilation, ventilatory CO2-chemosensitivity, or both. RESULTS: Remifentanil reduced isohypercapnic ventilation (end-tidal PCO2 6.5 kPa) by approximately 40% (from 20 to 12 litre min-1) in esketamine and placebo arms of the study, through an effect on baseline ventilation and ventilatory CO2 sensitivity. The reduction in ventilation was related to a remifentanil effect on ventilatory CO2 sensitivity (~39%) and on baseline ventilation (~61%). Esketamine increased breathing through an exclusive stimulatory effect on ventilatory CO2 sensitivity. The remifentanil concentration that reduced ventilatory CO2 sensitivity by 50% (C50) was doubled at an esketamine concentration of 127 (84-191) ng ml-1 [median (interquartile range)]; the esketamine effect was rapid and driven by plasma pharmacokinetics. Placebo had no systematic effect on opioid-induced respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: Esketamine effectively countered remifentanil-induced respiratory depression, an effect that was attributed to an increase in remifentanil-reduced ventilatory CO2 chemosensitivity.

[Handovers during anaesthetic care can be further improved]. / Anesthesiologische overdracht op de OK kan nog beter.

In 2005, the Dutch Society of Anaesthesiologists showed that handovers during anaesthetic care increase complication and mortality rates, an observation that has recently been confirmed by a Canadian study. In contrast to surgical care, handovers in anaesthetic care are quite common for various reasons including end of shift, tiredness after night duty, and activities outside the operating centre. The quality of handovers could be improved by training on an anaesthesia simulator, with emphasis on communication, reduction of information loss and using checklists.

Anomalies in target-controlled infusion: an analysis after 20 years of clinical use.

Although target-controlled infusion has been in use for more than two decades, its benefits are being obscured by anomalies in clinical practice caused by a number of important problems. These include: a variety of pharmacokinetic models available in open target-controlled infusion systems, which often confuse the user; the extrapolation of anthropomorphic data which provokes anomalous adjustments of dosing by such systems; and the uncertainty of regulatory requirements for the application of target-controlled infusion which causes uncontrolled exploitation of drugs and pharmacokinetic models in target-controlled infusion devices. Comparison of performance of pharmacokinetic models is complex and mostly inconclusive. However, a specific behaviour of a model in a target-controlled infusion system that is neither intended nor supported by scientific data can be considered an artefact or anomaly. Several of these anomalies can be identified in the current commercially available target-controlled infusion systems and are discussed in this review.

[Pain in cancer]. / Pijn bij kanker.

- Cancer patients often experience pain that has a significantly negative effect on their daily living.- This pain may be caused by the disease process itself, but may also be related to the treatment such as chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain, chronic pain following surgery and post-amputation pain.- In this training article we will discuss the different aspects of cancer-related pain, based on various questions posed by general practitioners and internists.- Items that are discussed include measurement of pain, opioid therapy, opioid side effects, adjuvant medication, barriers that preclude proper treatment of pain, opioid tolerance and addiction, and interventional therapy.- Pain treatment in cancer patients requires a multidisciplinary team effort, with a central role for the patient.

Deep neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (PNP) reduces postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. A lower insufflation pressure may hamper visibility and working space. The aim of the study is to investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions during low-pressure PNP. METHODS: This study was a blinded randomized controlled multicenter trial. 34 kidney donors scheduled for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy randomly received low-pressure PNP (6 mmHg) with either deep (PTC 1-5) or moderate NMB (TOF 0-1). In case of insufficient surgical conditions, the insufflation pressure was increased stepwise. Surgical conditions were rated by the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS) ranging from 1 (extremely poor) to 5 (optimal). RESULTS: Mean surgical conditions were significantly better for patients allocated to a deep NMB (SRS 4.5 versus 4.0; p < 0.01). The final insufflation pressure was 7.7 mmHg in patients with deep NMB as compared to 9.1 mmHg with moderate NMB (p = 0.19). The cumulative opiate consumption during the first 48 h was significantly lower in patients receiving deep NMB, while postoperative pain scores were similar. In four patients allocated to a moderate NMB, a significant intraoperative complication occurred, and in two of these patients a conversion to an open procedure was required. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that deep NMB facilitates the use of low-pressure PNP during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by improving the quality of the surgical field. The relatively high incidence of intraoperative complications indicates that the use of low pressure with moderate NMB may compromise safety during LDN. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT 02602964.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain management.

Achieving successful treatment of postoperative pain remains a challenge. Recently, a sufentanil sublingual tablet system has been developed for treatment of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. The phenylpiperidine sufentanil is a potent analgesic that rapidly crosses the blood-brain barrier and selectively activates central µ-opioid receptors. The system makes use of a hand-held dispenser system, which contains forty 15-µg sufentanil sublingual micro-tablets. The patient can release one tablet at 20-min intervals using a unique radiofrequency adhesive tag, which is wrapped around the patient's thumb. In this review, the authors discuss the pharmacology of sublingual sufentanil with reference to its suitability in the treatment of postoperative pain, the current evidence for the sublingual sufentanil system in postoperative pain treatment, and advantages and limitations of the sublingual system. We conclude that sufentanil is suited for the transmucosal route due to its pharmacokinetic profile, including rapid onset, absence of active metabolites and low tissue accumulation. The efficacy and safety of the sufentanil sublingual tablet system has been shown in over 600 patients in a limited set of studies; further independent studies are required to determine the position of the system among other forms of postoperative pain treatment. We conclude that the sublingual sufentanil tablet system allows effective pain relief, and allows patients to control their own pain relief and early postoperative mobility.